Re: Auto Partitioning

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Fetter
Тема Re: Auto Partitioning
Дата
Msg-id 20070406170757.GA3784@fetter.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Auto Partitioning  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Ответы Re: Auto Partitioning  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 09:22:55AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> >The people that use it are the people stuck by dogmatic rules about
> >"every table must have a primary key" or "every logical constraint
> >must be protected by a database constraint". Ie, database shops run
> >by the CYA principle.
> 
> Or ones that actually believe that every table where possible should
> have a primary key.
> 
> There are very, very few instances in good design where a table does
> not have a primary key.
> 
> It has nothing to do with CYA.

That depends on what you mean by CYA.  If you mean, "taking a
precaution just so you can show it's not your fault when the mature
hits the fan," I agree.  If you mean, "taking a precaution that will
actually prevent a problem from occurring in the first place," it
definitely does.

Cheers,
D
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778        AIM: dfetter666                             Skype: davidfetter

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to PostgreSQL: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?
Следующее
От: "Joshua D. Drake"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Auto Partitioning