Re: Auto Partitioning
| От | Joshua D. Drake |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Auto Partitioning |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 46167F9B.5060503@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Auto Partitioning (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Auto Partitioning
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
David Fetter wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 09:22:55AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>>> The people that use it are the people stuck by dogmatic rules about
>>> "every table must have a primary key" or "every logical constraint
>>> must be protected by a database constraint". Ie, database shops run
>>> by the CYA principle.
>> Or ones that actually believe that every table where possible should
>> have a primary key.
>>
>> There are very, very few instances in good design where a table does
>> not have a primary key.
>>
>> It has nothing to do with CYA.
>
> That depends on what you mean by CYA. If you mean, "taking a
> precaution just so you can show it's not your fault when the mature
> hits the fan," I agree. If you mean, "taking a precaution that will
> actually prevent a problem from occurring in the first place," it
> definitely does.
Heh, fair enough. When I think of CYA, I think of the former.
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Cheers,
> D
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: