Re: Auto Partitioning
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Auto Partitioning |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 461673DF.6050605@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Auto Partitioning (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Auto Partitioning
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> But if we could find a way to represent that it would make a lot of common use > cases much more convenient to use. > >>> (But that sounds rather like pie in the sky, actually. Which other >>> databases can do that, and how do they do it?) >> Oracle does it, by building a big index. Few people use it. > > The people that use it are the people stuck by dogmatic rules about "every > table must have a primary key" or "every logical constraint must be protected > by a database constraint". Ie, database shops run by the CYA principle. Or ones that actually believe that every table where possible should have a primary key. There are very, very few instances in good design where a table does not have a primary key. It has nothing to do with CYA. Joshua D. Drake -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: