On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 04:03:56PM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
> > Devrim,
> >
> >> With Mailman, we will have a better web interface, human-controllable
> >> web interface. Also we can have more people to administrate the mailing
> >> lists. It also has an e-mail interface so that people, who does not want
> >> to use web interface for moderation issues, can use it.
> >
> > Actually, I personally find the web interface for majordomo much easier to
> > use than Mailman. And I do both for pgfoundry and postgresql.org. For
> > one thing, the mailman interface has a tendency to force you to re-log-in
> > repeatedly, which is really annoying. Also, it has no way to do "discard
> > all e-mails in moderation queue"; you *have* to do them one at a time.
>
> Yes mailman is kind of a pain for that but honestly, if the only gripe
> is that we need to enter a password more than once... we must really
> consider how lazy we have become.
Well, the whole idea to switch came up this time for just that reason -
just a different kind of lazy that time.
I'm more concerned that we seem to be hitting a *lot* of bugs in mj2
that nobody else has seen, which tells me that not a lot of people are
using it. The mj2 stuff is obviously a lot less active than mailman. For
example, the only webpage I can fnid about it hasn't been updated in 7
years.
But obviously it *is* being maintained in some way, since Marc is in
contact with their people. But the question is how much...
//Magnus