Am Donnerstag, 28. Dezember 2006 19:52 schrieb Tom Lane:
> Not only is it overzealous, but the proposal to have one reflects a
> failure to learn from history. GUC variables that change
> transaction-boundary semantics are a bad idea, period: see autocommit.
But this option would not, in fact, change the transaction-boundary semantics.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/