Re: [GENERAL] Allowing SYSDATE to Work

Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
> Matt Miller wrote:
> > Yeah, and I don't expect that they'll be a rush to commit this to
> > head anytime soon.  I'll be happy enough tracking this locally.  I
> > think it's a win for my situation.
>
> Why should we add this Oraclism to PostgreSQL? I doesn't add any new
> feature.

Certainly, this feature falls well within the class of completely 
gratuitous proprietary extensions that we typically reject.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/