Re: [GENERAL] Allowing SYSDATE to Work
| От | Euler Taveira de Oliveira |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Allowing SYSDATE to Work |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20061118033329.GC3075@timbira.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Allowing SYSDATE to Work ("Matt Miller" <pgsql@mattmillersf.fastmail.fm>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] Allowing SYSDATE to Work
Re: [GENERAL] Allowing SYSDATE to Work |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Matt Miller wrote: > Yeah, and I don't expect that they'll be a rush to commit this to head > anytime soon. I'll be happy enough tracking this locally. I think it's > a win for my situation. > Why should we add this Oraclism to PostgreSQL? I doesn't add any new feature. I suggest you to contribute this kind of code to orafce project [1] because it's not standardized. [1] http://pgfoundry.org/projects/orafce/ -- Euler Taveira de Oliveira http://www.timbira.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: