Re: reindexdb command utlility

Tom Lane wrote:

> Yeah, *only because you said VERBOSE*.  When we implemented the current
> elog level scheme, we designed INFO as non-suppressible so that it would
> mimic the previous behavior of VACUUM VERBOSE.
>
Agreed.

> If REINDEX had a VERBOSE option, it would make sense to put out the
> messages as INFO when VERBOSE was used.  But it doesn't (and this is
> not a request to add one).  Without VERBOSE, I think it's utterly
> unacceptable to force the messages out regardless of client_min_messages.
> NOTICE was a reasonable level, maybe LOG would be a better one.  But
> not INFO.
>
LOG would be a good option, but maybe a small hack in reindexdb is
better.


--
  Euler Taveira de Oliveira
  http://www.timbira.com/