Re: reindexdb command utlility

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: reindexdb command utlility
Дата
Msg-id 200608220102.k7M12Os11560@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: reindexdb command utlility  (Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler@timbira.com>)
Список pgsql-bugs
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:

    http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches

It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------


Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Yeah, *only because you said VERBOSE*.  When we implemented the current
> > elog level scheme, we designed INFO as non-suppressible so that it would
> > mimic the previous behavior of VACUUM VERBOSE.
> >
> Agreed.
>
> > If REINDEX had a VERBOSE option, it would make sense to put out the
> > messages as INFO when VERBOSE was used.  But it doesn't (and this is
> > not a request to add one).  Without VERBOSE, I think it's utterly
> > unacceptable to force the messages out regardless of client_min_messages.
> > NOTICE was a reasonable level, maybe LOG would be a better one.  But
> > not INFO.
> >
> LOG would be a good option, but maybe a small hack in reindexdb is
> better.
>
>
> --
>   Euler Taveira de Oliveira
>   http://www.timbira.com/

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
>                http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

--
  Bruce Momjian   bruce@momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #2467: Documentation
Следующее
От: Jim Nasby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: referential integrity violation - key referenced from