I imagine because the name of the program as seen by the kernel (for
example with ps) uses the name the program was started with, not the
name of the actual binary. That way you can use the same binary for
multiple purposes.
If the link causes you a problem, replace the link with a copy of the
file, it won't change anything much.
BTW, it's an odd system that doesn't like links to programs. For
example, my system has the following:
/bin/sh -> bash
/sbin/modprobe -> insmod
/sbin/lsmod -> insmod
/sbin/ksyms -> insmod
/sbin/kallsyms -> insmod
/sbin/swapoff -> swapon
/sbin/reboot -> halt
/sbin/poweroff -> halt
/usr/bin/jmacs -> joe
/usr/bin/jstar -> joe
/usr/bin/i386-linux-gcc-3.3 -> gcc-3.3
/usr/bin/i486-linux-gcc-3.3 -> gcc-3.3
/usr/bin/i386-linux-g++-3.3 -> g++-3.3
/usr/bin/i486-linux-g++-3.3 -> g++-3.3
and hundreds more. It's not exactly uncommon...
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 02:20:11PM -0700, imoir@templetech.com wrote:
> Why is the postmaster link to the postgres executable used to run the postgres
> server rather than running the postgres executable directly? I have a client
> who wishes to use a monitoring application, and the fact that a link to an
> executable is used is causing a problem. Can the reference in the linux startup
> script be changed from the postmaster file to the postgres file?
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.