Thanks, for the input.
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Tom Lane
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 1:49 PM
To: cjwhite@cisco.com
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Help understanding VACUUM info on 7.4.5
"Chris White \(cjwhite\)" <cjwhite@cisco.com> writes:
> Does this mean it could be any transaction, even one that has not done
> anything with large objects, but one that started prior to the large
> objects being deleted?
Exactly.
> All access to the DB is done via JDBC, so has this JDBC issue been
> fixed in 7.4.5?
You'd have to ask the JDBC guys ...
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster