Re: [OT] Tom's/Marc's spam filters?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [OT] Tom's/Marc's spam filters?
Дата
Msg-id 200404220137.i3M1b9705956@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [OT] Tom's/Marc's spam filters?  (jseymour@LinxNet.com (Jim Seymour))
Ответы Re: [OT] Tom's/Marc's spam filters?  (jseymour@LinxNet.com (Jim Seymour))
Re: [OT] Tom's/Marc's spam filters?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-general
Jim Seymour wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote:
> >
> [snip]
> >
> > I don't have any problem using a backup MX.  My sendmail rules skip over
> > the received line from my MX and check the host that sent to my MX.
>
> What do you do if you don't like the client that delivered it to your
> backup MX?  You can't just throw it away.  Well, you *can*, but doing
> so breaks the email delivery system.  If reject it, your backup MX will
> then bounce it to the ostensible sender, which is very likely forged.

For stuff I block via sendmail, I 550 it, even from my MX.  I am not
sure what my MX does with it, but no one has complained.

For email that hits procmail, I ignore viruses and report spam to the
domain administrator of the mail sender host.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Jon Pastore"
Дата:
Сообщение: postgresql idle
Следующее
От: Bruno Wolff III
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 7.3.4 on Linux: UPDATE .. foo=foo+1 degrades massivly over time