Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Marc G. Fournier
Тема Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
Дата
Msg-id 20040421232248.W32445@ganymede.hub.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> I was thinking about CPAN.  They have download stuff, but it installs
> very easily.  I wonder if we should allow gborg projects to interface to
> our configure output in a way that makes it easier for them to be
> installed.

No, because again that requires you to download a large tar ball just to
get the build environment?

> The gborg is easy for development and releasing, but loses in the
> easy-of-use category sometimes.

So, what we *should* be looking at it some sort of howto on how to setup
an autoconf environment ... the basics aren't too hard, its only when you
get into the more complicated stuff that only *large* projects tend to get
into that it gets particulary confusing ...

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Rod Taylor
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
Следующее
От: "Marc G. Fournier"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions