Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Matthew T. O'Connor
Тема Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite)
Дата
Msg-id 200403242313.40049.matthew@zeut.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite)  (Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net>)
Ответы Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wednesday 24 March 2004 06:03 pm, Dustin Sallings wrote:
>     There's not a lot of GUI in arch, but star-merge is fairly incredible.
>   This is how tla (the main arch implementation) itself is developed.
> Lots of branches in lots of archives by lots of people.

I would guess that better merging might be a real motivation for people.  If a 
patch that takes a month to develop can still apply cleanly despite 
significant code drift in the interrem, I could see that as a real motivating 
factor.


Matthew


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Дата:
Сообщение: Email addresses on developer bios site
Следующее
От: Tatsuo Ishii
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] unicode error and problem