Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite)
Дата
Msg-id 6146.1080188983@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite)  ("Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net>)
Ответы Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite)  (Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
"Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net> writes:
> I would guess that better merging might be a real motivation for
> people.  If a patch that takes a month to develop can still apply
> cleanly despite significant code drift in the interrem, I could see
> that as a real motivating factor.

Not here.  You want me to trust some bit of code (with absolutely zero
understanding of the source text it's hacking on) to figure out how to
resolve conflicting patches?  That sounds like a recipe for big-time
unhappiness.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tatsuo Ishii
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] unicode error and problem
Следующее
От: Dustin Sallings
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite)