that works too ... basically, adding 'security' for a "load nly" mode
shouldn't be to difficult
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, scott.marlowe wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, scott.marlowe wrote:
> >
> > > Not so sure on whether the foot gun is a good idea. We already have .22
> > > calibre foot gun (fsync) that makes for pretty big improvements in load
> > > speed, and we see people all the time on General and Performance running
> > > production servers with it turned off. You know as well as I do the
> > > second we make WAL optional, some people are gonna start running
> > > production servers with it.
> >
> > it shouldn't be too difficult to put some sort of restrictions on its
> > usual ... say if WAL disabled, max connections == 2? :)
>
> Even better, restrict logins to superuser only, that way we could still
> have more than 2 things happening (think of a machine with a huge number
> of disks in a RAID array kinda thing) or only updateable / writeable by
> the superuser when in non-WAL mode.
>
>