k, try the search engine now ... I just found a 'missing index' on one of
the critical tables, and I'm getting more realistic speeds on search
results ...
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> go for it, point it at archives.postgresql.org though, since that is the
> major part of the search engine
>
> On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, scott.marlowe wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > okay, first off ... what URL? I've been working on, and testing, archives
> > > all week, and altho getting things down below a 2min search appears to be
> > > near impossible (anyone know something *better* then mnogosearch that will
> > > handle >250k URLs and growing ... ? we tried ht/Dig before, and the
> > > resources it suck'd were outrageous) ...
> >
> > Hi Marc, I use htdig at work to index a rather large web site and it
> > doesn't use resources all that bad. My htdig db directory is only 250
> > megs and it screams. Are you sure it was that bad?
> >
> > Would it be ok if I pointed a test instance of htdig at postgresql.org at
> > night and indexed it to get an idea of how much space it'll take to index
> > it? I'm a huge fan of htdig/ warts and all, so I'd kinda like to see if
> > it can be made to work.
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
>