Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?")

> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Great.  I think it can be made acceptable with little work.
>
> IIRC, the reason Jim's patch got bounced was exactly that it offered an
> implementation of only one policy, with no possibility of extension.

I read all the comments regarding Jim's patch, but would you mind stating
exactly what your concern is, Tom?  What do you mean by 'one policy'?

Chris