PostgreSQL, Inc has a commercial replication available, and I understand
there is a fair amount of activity going on with the PgReplication project
as well ...
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Ben wrote:
> Replication would help that. Our company would gladly use Postgres instead
> of MS SQL Server if postgres could do replication.
>
> On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>
> > PostgreSQL's real marketing problem is that it's too good to be
> > needed by the MySQL crowd (or they switch), and it's not a big
> > commercial package for the we-need-a-big-commercial-package crowd.
> > It's far from obvious that a name change would help in the latter
> > case, which is the real market potential. I wish I know what _would_
> > help that, though, in the absence of (sigh) Great Bridge.
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
>