> "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes:
> > As far as I see,fixed mapping relname to relation filename is the
> > problem. This doesn't allow the coexistence of old and new relation
> > files.
>
> Yes, and Vadim has proposed using relation OIDs as filenames for
> reasons of his own, IIRC.
>
> If we did that we could also solve the problems we have now with
> rolling back table deletion/rename inside an aborted transaction.
>
> I've been resisting this idea, but maybe it's time to bite the bullet
> and accept that relation filenames can't be the same as the logical
> names of the relations.
>
Yes, that is going to happen, clearly. New file names will be
table_name+oid. Solves many problems.
New file name will not be just oid. Too hard to administer.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026