Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alfred Perlstein
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers.
Дата
Msg-id 20000124173048.P26520@fw.wintelcom.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers.  (Patrick Welche <prlw1@newn.cam.ac.uk>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers.  (Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
* Patrick Welche <prlw1@newn.cam.ac.uk> [000124 16:02] wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 03:49:26PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > I just ran the regression tests as best as I know how:
> > 
> > ~/pgcvs/pgsql/src/test/regress % gmake runcheck
> > ~/pgcvs/pgsql/src/test/regress % grep FAIL run_check.out  
> >            test int2                 ... FAILED
> >            test int4                 ... FAILED
> >            test float8               ... FAILED
> > sequential test geometry             ... FAILED
> > ~/pgcvs/pgsql/src/test/regress %
> > 
> > no int2/int4? yipes!
> 
> Not to worry, those will be differences in error message wording, but
> 
> > I ran it 10 more times and one time I got:
> >            test constraints          ... FAILED
> 
> What did this error come from? (cf regression.diffs)
> 
> > but i got no weird parse errors or anything from the backend.
> > 
> > Have you been able to find any weirdness with the fix I posted,
> > or is this more likely an issue with Patrick Welche's setup?
> 
> I'm not sure: on the one hand, that evil join of mine returns the entire
> contents of a table, and the connection gets confused. Smaller joins work.
> Maybe it doesn't happen to you because you don't put in such a useless
> select (What do you want 750440 rows for?) On the other hand vacuum analyze
> table_name doesn't work for me but obviously does for everyone else, so at
> least something is wrong with my setup.

whoa whoa whoa... I just updated my snapshot to today's code and lot
more seems broken:

10 runs of the regression test:
          test aggregates           ... FAILED          test alter_table          ... FAILED          test btree_index
       ... FAILED          test create_misc          ... FAILED          test create_operator      ... FAILED
testfloat8               ... FAILED          test hash_index           ... FAILED          test int2
...FAILED          test int4                 ... FAILED          test limit                ... FAILED          test
portals             ... FAILED          test portals_p2           ... FAILED          test random               ...
FAILED         test rules                ... FAILED          test select_distinct      ... FAILED          test
select_distinct_on  ... FAILED          test select_views         ... FAILED          test transactions         ...
FAILED         test triggers             ... FAILED
 
sequential test create_type          ... FAILED
sequential test create_view          ... FAILED
sequential test geometry             ... FAILED
sequential test select               ... FAILED

I'm going to see what happens if i revert my changes 
to libpq completely, but before updating from and old
repo of 2-3 daysall i get are the int/float single constraints
error.

runtests and regression diffs are at:
http://www.freebsd.org/~alfred/postgresql/

-Alfred


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping
Следующее
От: The Hermit Hacker
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns