Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers.
От | Alfred Perlstein |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20000124173048.P26520@fw.wintelcom.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers. (Patrick Welche <prlw1@newn.cam.ac.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers.
(Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Patrick Welche <prlw1@newn.cam.ac.uk> [000124 16:02] wrote: > On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 03:49:26PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > I just ran the regression tests as best as I know how: > > > > ~/pgcvs/pgsql/src/test/regress % gmake runcheck > > ~/pgcvs/pgsql/src/test/regress % grep FAIL run_check.out > > test int2 ... FAILED > > test int4 ... FAILED > > test float8 ... FAILED > > sequential test geometry ... FAILED > > ~/pgcvs/pgsql/src/test/regress % > > > > no int2/int4? yipes! > > Not to worry, those will be differences in error message wording, but > > > I ran it 10 more times and one time I got: > > test constraints ... FAILED > > What did this error come from? (cf regression.diffs) > > > but i got no weird parse errors or anything from the backend. > > > > Have you been able to find any weirdness with the fix I posted, > > or is this more likely an issue with Patrick Welche's setup? > > I'm not sure: on the one hand, that evil join of mine returns the entire > contents of a table, and the connection gets confused. Smaller joins work. > Maybe it doesn't happen to you because you don't put in such a useless > select (What do you want 750440 rows for?) On the other hand vacuum analyze > table_name doesn't work for me but obviously does for everyone else, so at > least something is wrong with my setup. whoa whoa whoa... I just updated my snapshot to today's code and lot more seems broken: 10 runs of the regression test: test aggregates ... FAILED test alter_table ... FAILED test btree_index ... FAILED test create_misc ... FAILED test create_operator ... FAILED testfloat8 ... FAILED test hash_index ... FAILED test int2 ...FAILED test int4 ... FAILED test limit ... FAILED test portals ... FAILED test portals_p2 ... FAILED test random ... FAILED test rules ... FAILED test select_distinct ... FAILED test select_distinct_on ... FAILED test select_views ... FAILED test transactions ... FAILED test triggers ... FAILED sequential test create_type ... FAILED sequential test create_view ... FAILED sequential test geometry ... FAILED sequential test select ... FAILED I'm going to see what happens if i revert my changes to libpq completely, but before updating from and old repo of 2-3 daysall i get are the int/float single constraints error. runtests and regression diffs are at: http://www.freebsd.org/~alfred/postgresql/ -Alfred
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:
Следующее
От: The Hermit HackerДата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns