Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Langote
Тема Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order
Дата
Msg-id 1e891c0d-8c40-1410-81f8-229778af495a@lab.ntt.co.jp
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2017/08/17 11:22, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Amit Langote
> <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>>> In the catalogs we are using full "partitioned" e.g. pg_partitioned_table. May
>>> be we should name the column as "inhchildpartitioned".
>>
>> Sure.
> 
> I suggest inhpartitioned or inhispartition.  inhchildpartitioned seems too long.

inhchildpartitioned indeed seems long.

Since we storing if the child table (one with the OID inhrelid) is
partitioned, inhpartitioned seems best to me.  Will implement that.

Thanks,
Amit




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] One-shot expanded output in psql using \gx
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] SCRAM salt length