Re: [HACKERS] One-shot expanded output in psql using \gx

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Stephen Frost
Тема Re: [HACKERS] One-shot expanded output in psql using \gx
Дата
Msg-id CAOuzzgqn5i3ySSmkQLuRakj7=E-Ka4wFBCaunMrUDgg5dzDP0w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] One-shot expanded output in psql using \gx  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Noah, all,

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 22:24 Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 10:24:34PM +0200, Tobias Bussmann wrote:
> I've tested the new \gx against 10beta and current git HEAD. Actually one of my favourite features of PostgreSQL 10! However in my environment it was behaving strangely. After some debugging I found that \gx does not work if you have \set FETCH_COUNT n before. Please find attached a patch that fixes this incl. new regression test.

[Action required within three days.  This is a generic notification.]

The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item.  Stephen,
since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
item.  If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a
v10 open item, please let us know.  Otherwise, please observe the policy on
open item ownership[1] and send a status update within three calendar days of
this message.  Include a date for your subsequent status update.  Testers may
discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed
well in advance of shipping v10.  Consequently, I will appreciate your efforts
toward speedy resolution.  Thanks.

I'm in Boston this week but should be able to address this no later than Monday, August 21st,  and I will provide an update then.  

Thanks!

Stephen

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use
Следующее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order