Re: [HACKERS] Cutting initdb's runtime (Perl question embedded)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Cutting initdb's runtime (Perl question embedded)
Дата
Msg-id 1d15be07-f625-ce11-d4a9-2379cd0399a8@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Cutting initdb's runtime (Perl question embedded)  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Cutting initdb's runtime (Perl question embedded)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On 4/15/17 12:33, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Sure. Just means putting this code a bit later in the file. "make check"
> is only one initdb, so it won't cost much. I'm still inclined to force a
> TAP test for initdb with no TZ set, though.

How much is this going to buy overall?  Is it worth the complications?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fabien COELHO
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Variable substitution in psql backtick expansion
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Comment typo in xlogutils.c