Re: [HACKERS] Cutting initdb's runtime (Perl question embedded)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se> writes:
> Here is my proof of concept patch. It does basically the same thing as 
> Andres's patch except that it handles quoted values a bit better and 
> does not try to support anything other than the regproc type.

> The patch speeds up initdb without fsync from 0.80 seconds to 0.55 
> seconds, which is a nice speedup, while adding a negligible amount of 
> extra work on compilation.

I've pushed this with some mostly-cosmetic adjustments:

* created a single subroutine that understands how to split DATA lines,
rather than having several copies of the regex

* rearranged the code so that the data structure returned by
Catalog::Catalogs() isn't scribbled on (which was already
happening before your patch, but it seemed pretty ugly to me)

* stripped out the bootstrap-time name lookup code from all of reg*
not just regproc.

There's certainly lots more that could be done in the genbki code,
but I think all we can justify at this stage of the development
cycle is to get the low-hanging fruit for testing speedups.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] SUBSCRIPTIONS and pg_upgrade
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] pg_statistic_ext.staenabled might not be the best column name