Re: [HACKERS] Cutting initdb's runtime (Perl question embedded)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Cutting initdb's runtime (Perl question embedded)
Дата
Msg-id 20180510174057.lxvpwbgbbghz2zrm@alap3.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Cutting initdb's runtime (Perl question embedded)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Cutting initdb's runtime (Perl question embedded)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
Hi,

On 2018-05-10 12:18:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Next question is what to do with this.  Do we want to sit on it till
> v12, or sneak it in now?

Is there a decent argument for sneaking it in? I don't really have an
opinion. I don't think it'd really be arguable that this'll make testing
meaningfully faster. OTOH, it's fresh in your mind (which can be said
about a lot of patches obviously).

Greetings,

Andres Freund

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "David G. Johnston"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?