Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility
Дата
Msg-id 18890.1293547639@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 7:13 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>> Also, I notice that PGRES_COPY_BOTH was inserted "in the middle" of
>> the enum. Doesn't that mean we can get incorrect values for e.g.
>> PGRES_FATAL_ERROR if the client is built against one version of libpq
>> but executes against another? Shouldn't all such enum values always be
>> added at the end?

> I think you are right, and that we should fix this.

Yes, that was a completely wrong move :-(
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: "writable CTEs"
Следующее
От: "Kevin Grittner"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: estimating # of distinct values