Re: "writable CTEs"
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: "writable CTEs" |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1293546926.9478.1.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: "writable CTEs" (Peter Geoghegan <peter.geoghegan86@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: "writable CTEs"
Re: "writable CTEs" Re: "writable CTEs" |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On tis, 2010-12-28 at 00:19 +0000, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > It's worth noting that officially (i.e. in the docs), we don't even > call CTEs CTEs at any point. We call them WITH queries. I think that > that's a mistake because we call them CTEs everywhere else. I think "WITH query" or "WITH clause" is more understandable than CTE, which to me is a term that has no relationship with anything else.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: