Re: No easy way to join discussion in existing thread when not subscribed
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: No easy way to join discussion in existing thread when not subscribed |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1862.1443364871@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | No easy way to join discussion in existing thread when not subscribed (Amir Rohan <amir.rohan@mail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: No easy way to join discussion in existing thread
when not subscribed
Re: No easy way to join discussion in existing thread when not subscribed |
| Список | pgsql-www |
Amir Rohan <amir.rohan@mail.com> writes:
> I've read elsewhere that a possible solution is to provide a
> mail address associated with a message (displayed on the web interface)
> that routes your mail message to the thread.
Seems awfully like a here-please-spam-us button. The address would have
to be displayed un-obfuscated, which means it'd get picked up by spammers'
webcrawlers. Admittedly, no one would know except the PG list moderators,
but I think they'd be unhappy about an increase in workload.
And before you ask: yes, spammers still do that. A lot. For example,
just a few hours ago my mailserver bounced something
Sep 27 06:30:05 sss1 sendmail[29150]: t8RAU4Ja029150: <12716.1437746049@sss.pgh.pa.us>... User unknown
that certainly has never been used as a mail address, but it does match
a message-ID in the pgsql-hackers archives from July. I see no plausible
explanation for that except that somebody scraped it off the archives and
took it for a deliverable address. This is not an isolated example; I see
anywhere from a couple dozen to several hundred *per day* like this in my
mail logs.
There are ways around that, probably, but I'm not sure it's worth the
work.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: