Re: [HACKERS] Mishandling of WCO constraints in direct foreign tablemodification

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Etsuro Fujita
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Mishandling of WCO constraints in direct foreign tablemodification
Дата
Msg-id 15aa9936-9bd8-c9e3-7ca1-3948610734b4@lab.ntt.co.jp
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Mishandling of WCO constraints in direct foreign table modification  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Mishandling of WCO constraints in direct foreigntable modification  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On 2017/07/21 3:24, Robert Haas wrote:
> I think that's reasonable.  This should be committed and back-patched
> to 9.6, right?

Yeah, because direct modify was introduced in 9.6.

Attached is the second version which updated docs in postgres-fdw.sgml 
as well.

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] huge RAM use in multi-command ALTER of tableheirarchy
Следующее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] pageinspect function to decode infomasks