Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] pageinspect function to decode infomasks

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Craig Ringer
Тема Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] pageinspect function to decode infomasks
Дата
Msg-id CAMsr+YHKpq2LwSpcsGfMRnww3jPohQnYbfdep6Hy+NX-+WUn9Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] pageinspect function to decode infomasks  (Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] pageinspect function to decode infomasks  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 20 July 2017 at 19:09, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com> wrote:
I had a quick look into this patch and also tested it and following
are my observations.

1) I am seeing a server crash when passing any non meaningful value
for t_infomask2 to heap_infomask_flags().

postgres=# SELECT heap_infomask_flags(2816, 3);
server closed the connection unexpectedly
    This probably means the server terminated abnormally
    before or while processing the request.
The connection to the server was lost. Attempting reset: Failed.
!> \q

Following is the backtrace,

(gdb) bt
#0  0x0000000000d9c55b in pg_detoast_datum (datum=0x0) at fmgr.c:1833
#1  0x0000000000b87374 in construct_md_array (elems=0x2ad74c0,
nulls=0x0, ndims=1, dims=0x7ffc0b0bbcd0, lbs=0x7ffc0b0bbcc0,
elmtype=25, elmlen=-1,
    elmbyval=0 '\000', elmalign=105 'i') at arrayfuncs.c:3382
#2  0x0000000000b8709f in construct_array (elems=0x2ad74c0, nelems=10,
elmtype=25, elmlen=-1, elmbyval=0 '\000', elmalign=105 'i') at
arrayfuncs.c:3316
#3  0x00007fb8001603a5 in heap_infomask_flags (fcinfo=0x2ad3b88) at
heapfuncs.c:597


Fixed.
 
2) I can see the documentation for heap_infomask(). But, I do not see
it being defined or used anywhere in the patch.

+     <para>
+      The <function>heap_infomask</function> function can be used to unpack the
+      recognised bits of the infomasks of heap tuples.
+     </para>

Fixed. Renamed the function, missed a spot.
 
3) If show_combined flag is set to it's default value and a tuple is
frozen then may i know the reason for not showing it as frozen tuple
when t_infomask2
is passed as zero.

It was a consequence of (1). Fixed.


4) I think, it would be better to use the same argument name for the
newly added function i.e heap_infomask_flags() in both documentation
and sql file. I am basically refering to 'include_combined' argument.
IF you see the function definition, the argument name used is
'include_combined' whereas in documentation you have mentioned
'show_combined'.

Fixed, thanks.

I want to find time to expand the tests on this some more and look more closely, but here it is for now.

--
 Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Etsuro Fujita
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Mishandling of WCO constraints in direct foreign tablemodification
Следующее
От: "Joshua D. Drake"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] autovacuum can't keep up, bloat just continues to rise