Re: Wanted: jsonb on-disk representation documentation

Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> * The jentry representation should be changed so it's possible to get the type
>   of a entry without checking individual types. That'll make code like
>   findJsonbValueFromSuperHeader() (well, whatever you've renamed it to)
>   much easier to read. Preferrably so it an have the same values (after
>   shifting/masking) ask the JBE variants. And it needs space for futher
>   types (or representations thereof).

Further types?  What further types?  JSON seems unlikely to grow any
other value types than what it's got.
        regards, tom lane