Re: Recent eelpout failures on 9.x branches
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Recent eelpout failures on 9.x branches |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1531503.1606864037@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Recent eelpout failures on 9.x branches (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Recent eelpout failures on 9.x branches
Re: Recent eelpout failures on 9.x branches |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> Unfortunately, eelpout got kicked off the nice shiny ARM server it was
> running on so last week I moved it to a rack mounted Raspberry Pi. It
> seems to be totally I/O starved causing some timeouts to be reached,
> and I'm looking into fixing that by adding fast storage. This may
> take a few days. Sorry for the noise.
Ah-hah. Now that I look, eelpout is very clearly slower overall
than it was a couple weeks ago, so all is explained.
It might still be reasonable to raise wal_sender_timeout in the
buildfarm environment, though. We usually try to make sure that
buildfarm timeouts border on ridiculous, not just because of
underpowered critters but also for cases like CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS
animals.
I'm also wondering a bit why the issue isn't affecting the newer
branches. It's certainly not because we made the test shorter ...
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: