Re: Recent eelpout failures on 9.x branches

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Munro
Тема Re: Recent eelpout failures on 9.x branches
Дата
Msg-id CA+hUKGLVbeh87VrXvR4fo9nDOfxY7sk5Cv6=Lbds6bPmCnP1Tw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Recent eelpout failures on 9.x branches  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 12:07 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I'm also wondering a bit why the issue isn't affecting the newer
> branches.  It's certainly not because we made the test shorter ...

I looked at htop while it was building the 9.x branches and saw
pg_basebackup sitting in D state waiting for glacial I/O.  Perhaps
this was improved by the --no-sync option that got sprinkled around
the place in later releases?



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_stat_statements oddity with track = all
Следующее
От: Ajin Cherian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions