On 11/30/20 8:14 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2020-11-29 18:36, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>
>> I don't really get the point of this function. There is AFAICT no
>> function to produce this escaped format, and it's not a recognized
>> interchange format. So under what circumstances would one need to
>> use this?
>>
>>
>> Some corporate data can be in CSV format with escaped unicode
>> characters. Without this function it is not possible to decode these
>> files without external application.
>
> I would like some supporting documentation on this. So far we only
> have one stackoverflow question, and then this implementation, and
> they are not even the same format. My worry is that if there is not
> precise specification, then people are going to want to add things in
> the future, and there will be no way to analyze such requests in a
> principled way.
>
>
>
Also, should this be an extension? I'm dubious about including such
marginal uses in the core code unless there's a really good case for it.
cheers
andrew