Re: Recovery Test Framework
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Recovery Test Framework |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 15178.1231809166@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Recovery Test Framework (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Recovery Test Framework
Re: Recovery Test Framework Re: Recovery Test Framework |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
>>> 1. Remove the messages size limits on -hackers. They serve no useful
>>> purpose, and they interfere with our development process.
>>
>> Agreed, or at least boost it up a good bit more.
> the question really is how much "a bit more" is - right now the limit is
> 100000 characters which limits us to ~70KB of attachments (around the
> size of the Hot-standby patch if bzip2 compressed).
> The SE-Postgres patch for example is ~650KB uncompressed - if we want to
> cope with uncompressed patches that large we would have to increase
> the current limit by a factor of 10 at least.
I feel no need to encourage people to send huge patches uncompressed ;-)
gzip normally gets at least 3x or 4x on large diffs. So a limit around
250K ought to be enough.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: