Re: Recovery Test Framework

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Recovery Test Framework
Дата
Msg-id 603c8f070901121734q44c15610y92f55f92274f5cdc@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Recovery Test Framework  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> I feel no need to encourage people to send huge patches uncompressed ;-)
> gzip normally gets at least 3x or 4x on large diffs.  So a limit around
> 250K ought to be enough.

To paraphrase a leading authority on PostgreSQL development, and with
tongue firmly in cheek, there's something to what you say, but
consider that we have pretty much unanimous agreement that 100k is too
small.  I think we should try to fix the problem, not just gradually
ratchet up the value until people start complaining in the other
direction.  :-)

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-12/msg00809.php

...Robert


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Gregory Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Recovery Test Framework
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Recovery Test Framework