Re: index over timestamp not being used

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: index over timestamp not being used
Дата
Msg-id 15140.1185306195@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: index over timestamp not being used  (Arnau <arnaulist@andromeiberica.com>)
Ответы Re: index over timestamp not being used  (Mario Weilguni <mweilguni@sime.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
Arnau <arnaulist@andromeiberica.com> writes:
>> Alternatively, do you really need to_timestamp at all?  The standard
>> timestamp input routine won't have any problem with that format:
>> t.timestamp_in >= '20070101'

> This is always I think I'm worried, what happens if one day the internal
> format in which the DB stores the date/timestamps changes. I mean, if
> instead of being stored as YYYYMMDD is stored as DDMMYYYY, should we
> have to change all the queries?

You are confusing internal storage format with the external
representation.

> I thought the
> to_char/to_date/to_timestamp functions were intented for this purposes

No, they're intended for dealing with wacky formats that the regular
input/output routines can't understand or produce.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Arnau
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: index over timestamp not being used
Следующее
От: "Merlin Moncure"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 8.2 -> 8.3 performance numbers