Re: index over timestamp not being used
| От | Mario Weilguni |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: index over timestamp not being used |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200707251505.11182.mweilguni@sime.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: index over timestamp not being used (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: index over timestamp not being used
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Am Dienstag 24 Juli 2007 schrieb Tom Lane: > > I thought the > > to_char/to_date/to_timestamp functions were intented for this purposes > > No, they're intended for dealing with wacky formats that the regular > input/output routines can't understand or produce. Really? I use them alot, because of possible problems with different date formats. 20070503 means May 3, 2007 for germans, I don't know what it means to US citizens, but following the strange logic of having the month first (8/13/2005) it might mean March 5, 2007 too. Therefore, using to_timestamp seems to be a safe choice for me, working in any environment regardless of the "date_style" setting.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: