Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2019-05-17 10:29:46 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Also, how do people feel about adopting the function prototype
>> indenting change discussed in
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAEepm%3D0P3FeTXRcU5B2W3jv3PgRVZ-kGUXLGfd42FFhUROO3ug%40mail.gmail.com
> I think it'd be a huge improvement.
Yeah, that's probably the biggest remaining bug/issue in pgindent.
> Would we want to also apply this to the back branches to avoid spurious
> conflicts?
I dunno, how far back are you thinking? I've occasionally wished we
could reindent all the back branches to match HEAD, but realistically,
people carrying out-of-tree patches would scream.
regards, tom lane