On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 01:47:02PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > On 2019-05-17 10:29:46 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Also, how do people feel about adopting the function prototype
> >> indenting change discussed in
> >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAEepm%3D0P3FeTXRcU5B2W3jv3PgRVZ-kGUXLGfd42FFhUROO3ug%40mail.gmail.com
>
> > I think it'd be a huge improvement.
>
> Yeah, that's probably the biggest remaining bug/issue in pgindent.
>
> > Would we want to also apply this to the back branches to avoid spurious
> > conflicts?
>
> I dunno, how far back are you thinking? I've occasionally wished we
> could reindent all the back branches to match HEAD, but realistically,
> people carrying out-of-tree patches would scream.
My regular backpatch pain is SGML files. :-(
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +