Re: Recovery Test Framework

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Recovery Test Framework
Дата
Msg-id 1452.1231778023@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Recovery Test Framework  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Ответы Re: Recovery Test Framework  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Re: Recovery Test Framework  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Re: Recovery Test Framework  ("Robert Haas" <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Re: Recovery Test Framework  (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>)
Список pgsql-hackers
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> Two things to fix this, and several other problems:

> 1.  Remove the messages size limits on -hackers.  They serve no useful
> purpose, and they interfere with our development process.

Agreed, or at least boost it up a good bit more.

> If -hackers
> isn't already subscriber-only, now would be the time to make it so.

Not sure how that's relevant?

> 2.  Start using more git, as many hackers and committers have already
> started to do.  This is the kind of situation where CVS just plain
> falls down because branching and merging are unmanageably difficult in
> it, where in git, they're many-times-a-day operations.

This is a red herring, unless your proposal also includes making the
master CVS^H^H^Hgit repository world-writable.  The complaint I have
about people posting URLs is that there's no stable archive of what the
patches really were, and just because it came out of someone's local git
repository doesn't help that.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Assertion failure in plpgsql with INSTEAD OF rule
Следующее
От: "Joshua D. Drake"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Recovery Test Framework