Re: effective_cache_size vs units
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: effective_cache_size vs units |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 14040.1166573774@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: effective_cache_size vs units (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: effective_cache_size vs units
Re: effective_cache_size vs units Re: effective_cache_size vs units Re: effective_cache_size vs units |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Perhaps it would be more effective to clarify the error message? Right
> now it just says something to the effect of "invalid integer". I'd
> imagine "invalid memory unit: TB" would be less confusing.
+1 on that, but I think we should just accept the strings
case-insensitively, too. SQL in general is not case sensitive for
keywords, and neither is anything else in the postgresql.conf file,
so I argue it's inconsistent to be strict about the case for units.
Nor do I believe that we'd ever accept a future patch that made
the distinction between "kb" and "kB" significant --- if you think
people are confused now, just imagine what would happen then.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: