Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)
Дата
Msg-id 13958.1545267706@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)  (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes:
> Is there any particular reason not to go further and use a perfect hash
> function for the lookup, rather than binary search?

Tooling?  I seem to recall having looked at gperf and deciding that it
pretty much sucked, so it's not real clear to me what we would use.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writablevariables)
Следующее
От: Tatsuro Yamada
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Tab completion for ALTER INDEX|TABLE ALTER COLUMN SET STATISTICS