>>>>> "John" == John Naylor <jcnaylor@gmail.com> writes:
> On 12/18/18, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I'd be kind of inclined to convert all uses of ScanKeyword to the
>> new way, if only for consistency's sake. On the other hand, I'm not
>> the one volunteering to do the work.
John> That's reasonable, as long as the design is nailed down first.
John> Along those lines, attached is a heavily WIP patch that only
John> touches plpgsql unreserved keywords, to test out the new
John> methodology in a limited area. After settling APIs and
John> name/directory bikeshedding, I'll move on to the other four
John> keyword types.
Is there any particular reason not to go further and use a perfect hash
function for the lookup, rather than binary search?
--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)