Re: SQL/MED - core functionality
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: SQL/MED - core functionality |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 13484.1290701903@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: SQL/MED - core functionality (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: SQL/MED - core functionality
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> I left out some details on what exactly FdwPlan should contain and what
> it's lifecycle should be. I'm thinking that it should be allocated in
> the CurrentMemoryContext that's active when the FDW Plan routine is
> called, which would be the same context where we store all the Plan
> objects. It should not be modified after creation, so that it doesn't
> need to be copied when the ForeignScan is copied with copyObject(). It
> should not contain transient state information like connection objects,
> or references to a remotely prepared cursor etc. It must be possible to
> call BeginScan multiple times with the same FdwPlan object, so that it
> can be stored in a prepared plan that is executed multiple times.
The above statements seem mutually contradictory. In particular,
I think you're proposing that copyObject copy only a pointer and not the
whole plan tree when copying ForeignScan. That is entirely
unworkable/unacceptable: quite aside from the semantic ugliness, it will
fail altogether for cached plans.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: