To keep indexes in memory, is large enough effective_cache_sizeenough?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Sam R.
Тема To keep indexes in memory, is large enough effective_cache_sizeenough?
Дата
Msg-id 1321418371.5650982.1537346138600@mail.yahoo.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: To keep indexes in memory, is large enough effective_cache_size enough?  (Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org>)
Re: To keep indexes in memory, is large enough effective_cache_sizeenough?  ("Sam R." <samruohola@yahoo.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
Hi!

Related to my other email (size of index in memory),

Other questions,
Q: To keep _index(es)_ in memory, is large enough effective_cache_size enough?
Q: Size of shared_buffers does not matter regarding keeping index in memory?

Or have I missed something, does it matter (to keep indexes in memory)?

Background info: I have plans to use hash indexes: very large amount of data in db tables, but (e.g. hash) indexes could be kept in memory.

I am using PostgreSQL 10. I could start to use PostgreSQL 11, after it has been released.

Best Regards, Sam

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Sam R."
Дата:
Сообщение: How to see/calculate size of index in memory?
Следующее
От: Sergei Kornilov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: How to see/calculate size of index in memory?