On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 20:57 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Hannu Krosing <hannu@krosing.net> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 14:36 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 6:58 AM, Craig Ringer
> >> <craig@postnewspapers.com.au> wrote:
> >> > So rather than asking "should core have a connection pool" perhaps
> >> > what's needed is to ask "what can an in-core pool do that an external
> >> > pool cannot do?"
> >>
> >> Avoid sending every connection through an extra hop.
> >
> > not really. in-core != magically-in-right-backend-process
>
> Well, how about if we arrange it so it IS in the right backend
> process? I don't believe magic is required.
Do you have any design in mind, how you can make it so ?
---------------
Hannu