On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 20:56 +0100, Hannu Krosing wrote:
>
> > Let's extend this shall we:
> >
> > Avoid adding yet another network hop
>
> postgreSQL is multi-process, so you either have a separate "pooler
> process" or need to put pooler functionality in postmaster, bothw ways
> you still have a two-hop scenario for connect. you may be able to pass
> the socket to child process and also keep it, but doing this for both
> client and db sides seems really convoluted.
Which means, right now there is three hops. Reducing one is good.
> Or is there a prortable way to pass sockets back and forth between
> parent and child processes ?
>
> If so, then pgbouncer could use it as well.
>
> > Remove of a point of failure
>
> rather move the point of failure from external pooler to internal
> pooler ;)
Yes but at that point, it doesn't matter.
>
> > Reduction of administrative overhead
>
> Possibly. But once you start actually using it, you still need to
> configure and monitor it and do other administrator-y tasks.
Yes, but it is inclusive.
>
> > Integration into our core authentication mechanisms
>
> True, although for example having SSL on client side connection will be
> so slow that it hides any performance gains from pooling, at least for
> short-lived connections.
Yes, but right now you can't use *any* pooler with LDAP for example. We
could if pooling was in core. Your SSL argument doesn't really work
because its true with or without pooling.
> > Greater flexibility in connection control
>
> Yes, poolers can be much more flexible than default postgresql. See for
> example pgbouncers PAUSE , RECONFIGURE and RESUME commands
:D
>
> > And, having connection pooling in core does not eliminate the use of an
> > external pool where it makes since.
>
> Probably the easiest way to achieve "pooling in core" would be adding an
> option to start pgbouncer under postmaster control.
Yeah but that won't happen. Also I think we may have a libevent
dependency that we have to work out.
>
> You probably can't get much leaner than pgbouncer.
Oh don't get me wrong. I love pgbouncer. It is my recommended pooler but
even it has limitations (such as auth).
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt