Re: Hot Standby and handling max_standby_delay
| От | Simon Riggs |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Hot Standby and handling max_standby_delay |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1263666037.26654.50527.camel@ebony обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Hot Standby and handling max_standby_delay (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Hot Standby and handling max_standby_delay
Re: Hot Standby and handling max_standby_delay |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 2010-01-16 at 11:37 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes: > > I'm wondering if it wouldn't just be easier to put in a plugin for > > recovery conflict handling, so the user can decide what to do > > themselves. That seems like a better plan than chewing through these > > issues now. > > Making it a plugin doesn't solve anything. This is not the kind of > thing where people can come up with some random policy and it will > work well. Anyone competent to invent a better policy would be quite > capable of modifying the source to suit themselves. Agreed, with some regrets. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: